Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 79.8. The Google Pixel 4 construction is just a bit lighter but just a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z4, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display density. Moto Z4 takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto Z4 has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.