Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray and White | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4, with an 82.9 score against 79.8. The Google Pixel 4a body is newer and lighter than Motorola Moto Z4's, although it is also a bit thicker. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Moto Z4 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto Z4 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto Z4 has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.