Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 has a general score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Moto Z4's construction is notably newer, a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto Z4 has just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 4 more cores. HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z4 captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto Z4 also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture.
Moto Z4 has longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 20 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola Moto Z4 is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.