Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z4, having an 84.3 score against 79.8. Although it's the best phone we compare here, LG G8 ThinQ is a thicker and a little heavier phone than the Moto Z4. Both of these devices include Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG G8 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z4 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
The Moto Z4 has a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG G8 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.