Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Gray and White | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4, getting an 82.5 score against 79.8. Even being the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also a just a little heavier and a little thicker cellphone. These devices have Android operating system, but the LG G8S ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features and improved performance.
LG G8S ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Moto Z4, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2248, a just a little lower pixels amount in each display inch and a bit smaller screen. The LG G8S ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z4 counts with a little better battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z4 captures much better pictures and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.