Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. The LG G8X ThinQ body is heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z4. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS. LG G8X ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4. Both have a greater pixel quantity per screen inch, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a same size screen. The LG G8X ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Moto Z4 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot more MP back camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.