Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is just a bit better than LG V10, getting a general score of 79.8 against 78.6. Moto Z4's construction is notably newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than LG V10. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Moto Z4 has newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, giving lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Moto Z4 features a little better performance than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto Z4 also has 7 more cpu cores. LG V10 features a much better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better display density.
Moto Z4 captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG V10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
LG V10 features just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z4 counts with better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 3600mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Moto Z4, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V10, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.