Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little lighter phone than the Motorola Moto Z4, but both of them are equally thin. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density. Moto Z4 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z4 also counts with a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much more mega-pixels camera.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z4 features a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.