Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z4, with an 81.2 score against 79.8. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, we must note that it's also a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z4 features a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.