Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gray and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than the Moto Z4, with an 87.6 score against 79.8. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Moto Z4, it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and videos, a much less MP camera and a way lower video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V60 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.