Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z4, having an 87.1 score against 79.8. LG Velvet's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z4's, but it is just a little heavier and just a little thicker. LG Velvet has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger display. Motorola Moto Z4 captures slightly better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a 48 MP resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features greater battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.