Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gray and White | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z4, with a general score of 80.3 against 79.8. These devices have the same Android 10 operating system, so both should provide all the same OS features. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z4, but it is thicker and incredibly heavier.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM. Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Moto Z4 count with really similar displays, because although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a quite lower pixels count in each inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Moto Z4 counts with slightly more storage to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is more expensive than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z4. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z4, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.