Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Motorola Moto Z4 is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's incredibly lighter and notably thinner anyway.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity in each display inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a bit larger display.
The Moto Z4 counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z4 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with better battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a back camera with much more megapixels and a much higher video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Moto Z4 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.