Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4, having a global score of 79.9 against 79.8. Although Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a lot newer than the Motorola Moto Z4, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit worse pixels count in each inch of display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a quite bigger display.
Motorola Moto Z4 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.