Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Moto Z4, getting an 83.8 score against 79.8. Even though Galaxy A50 is better than Moto Z4, we must tell that it's also just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z4. They have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the same screen pixel density and a same size display.
Moto Z4 and Galaxy A50 both have quite similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and the same internal memory. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z4. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
Galaxy A50 features just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has an 11% bigger battery size. Moto Z4 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.