Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than Moto Z4's 79.8 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, offering some additional features and a performance increase. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is an a little thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than Moto Z4.
The Galaxy A51 has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z4. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A51 features a bit better looking display than Moto Z4, because it has a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A51 has a camera that's very similar to the Moto Z4 one, and although the Galaxy A51 has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video quality. The Galaxy A51 and Motorola Moto Z4 feature incredibly similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same internal memory and an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.