Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. The Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z4, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better display than Moto Z4, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit greater screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has better battery life than Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh. The Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.