Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a general score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. Although the Motorola Moto Z4 is a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A6, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. The Motorola Moto Z4 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A6, because it has a quite bigger display, a better pixel count in each display inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Moto Z4 counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto Z4 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor. The Moto Z4 counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 3600mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A6, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.