Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Moto Z4 body is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A70, even though both of them were released only 1 months apart.
The Galaxy A70 has a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto Z4 and Samsung Galaxy A70 count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a just a bit lower pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Moto Z4 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A70 and Moto Z4 have incredibly similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A70, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.