Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola Moto Z4, getting a 92.9 score against 79.8. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 operating system. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer than Motorola Moto Z4's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little sharper display than Moto Z4, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more than the Motorola Moto Z4, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.