Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gray and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than Moto Z4's score of 79.8. Galaxy F41's construction is newer than Moto Z4's, but it's thicker and heavier. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy F41 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy F41 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z4. They have the same display density, a display with the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F41 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.