Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gray and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than Moto Z4, with an 88.1 score against 79.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and performance enhancements. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than Moto Z4, it is extremely thicker and heavier.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy F62 features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z4, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 94 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.