Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 score. Despite being the best we are comparing, we must highlight that it is also somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features a screen that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto Z4, and although the Samsung Galaxy M30 has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. The Galaxy M30's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Motorola Moto Z4 one, they have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto Z4 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M30, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Moto Z4 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a much larger sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy M30 has a very superior battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.