Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. These phones come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Galaxy M51's construction is newer than the Moto Z4's, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier.
Galaxy M51 features a display that's just as good as Moto Z4's screen, because although the Galaxy M51 has a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Galaxy M51 and Moto Z4 have very similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and equal internal storage.
Galaxy M51 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy M51 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 94% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.