Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than Moto Z4, having an 81.2 score against 79.8. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Moto Z4, we must note that it is also an extremely older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier device.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto Z4, although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a quite lower pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better processing power than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Moto Z4 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Moto Z4 also has a lot larger sensor, a back camera with much more megapixels and a much bigger aperture. Moto Z4 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto Z4 has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.