Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than Moto Z4's general score of 79.8. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than Moto Z4. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z4. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto Z4 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger sensor.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto Z4 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is more expensive than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z4, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.