Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gray and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is just a little bit thicker but just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto Z4, and they were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a better screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. Galaxy S10 has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10 and Motorola Moto Z4 count with very similar storage to install applications and games, both of them have the same internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto Z4 has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.