Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gray and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Moto Z4, with a 93.6 score against 79.8. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it gives some extra features and better performance. Even being the best device we compare here, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a little bit better pixel density and a quite larger display.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a superior camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Moto Z4 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 5G has superior battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.