Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Moto Z4, with an 89.7 score against 79.8. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a heavier and a little thicker phone. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better CPU than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.