Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gray and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Motorola Moto Z4 were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10e body is a bit lighter but also a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto Z4 takes better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e and Moto Z4 feature really similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto Z4 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.