Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gray and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Moto Z4, with a global score of 90.8 against 79.8. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, providing a couple additional features and improved performance. Galaxy S20 FE's design is newer than the Moto Z4's, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z4, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
The Moto Z4 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a much more MP back camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a little more expensive than Motorola Moto Z4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.