Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-06 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Moto Z4's overall score of 79.8. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and a lot thinner phone than Moto Z4. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch and a quite bigger display. The Moto Z4 counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video quality. The Moto Z4 has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.