Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gray and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a 79.8 score against 75.8. Motorola Moto Z4 is a a lot newer phone, and it's also lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Moto Z4 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto Z4 also has 4 more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. Moto Z4 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a much more megapixels camera.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Moto Z4, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.