Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-06 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, having a general score of 79.8 against 78.1. Even though the Motorola Moto Z4 is just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it's just a little bit thinner and much newer. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto Z4 has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto Z4 features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Moto Z4 has a superior camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z4 also has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto Z4 and Galaxy S7 edge both count with similar batteries duration.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Moto Z4, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.