Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z4, although it's much thicker and incredibly heavier.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z4. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP, a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Moto Z4 has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z4, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.