Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an extremely heavier and noticeably thicker phone than the Moto Z4.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z4. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bit better number of pixels per screen inch.
Moto Z4 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a much better video resolution, a way higher resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
The Moto Z4 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.