Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer and a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Moto Z4.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little higher pixels number in each inch of screen.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto Z4 has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The Moto Z4 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z4, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.