Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer and just a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto Z4's, but it is a little heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper display than Moto Z4, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit bigger display. Motorola Moto Z4 has a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Moto Z4 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot better 48 MP resolution back camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 9 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more money than Motorola Moto Z4, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.