Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gray and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Motorola Moto Z4, with a score of 94.6 against 79.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto Z4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z4, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a larger screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Moto Z4 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Moto Z4 has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z4, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.