Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gray and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z4's overall score of 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a way newer and thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto Z4, although it's extremely heavier. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola Moto Z4 have really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z4 captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and a way bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments. The Moto Z4 features a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features greater battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.