Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-06 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than Moto Z4, getting a 91.1 score against 79.8. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a much thinner but incredibly heavier device than Moto Z4.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184px and a bigger screen.
Moto Z4 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior storage for applications and games than Moto Z4, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z4, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.