Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 has a score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z4 has 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. Despite of the fact that Moto Z4 is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's body is much lighter and thinner.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z4. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a screen that's very similar to Motorola Moto Z4's screen, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto Z4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S count with very similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, they both have the same video frame rate, a same size sensor, a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 39% more battery size.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.