Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2's 81.6 overall score. Even though Motorola One 5G Ace is notably newer than the Google Pixel 2, it's way heavier and extremely thicker. Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more mega-pixels. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% more battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.