Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2021-01-14 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than LG V20's global score of 77. Motorola One 5G Ace is a notably newer device than the LG V20, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V20 has a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display density.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The LG V20 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V20 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a very superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 56% bigger battery capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace features a much better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a way more MP back facing camera.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you want to save some money, you can buy LG V20, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.