Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LTPS | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting an 84.7 score against 81.6. Although Galaxy A32 and Motorola One 5G Ace were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy A32 is just a little thinner and a bit lighter. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit larger display, a better pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola One 5G Ace and the Galaxy A32 both feature really similar storage capacity for apps and games, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and the same 64 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a battery life that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola One 5G Ace.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.