Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Motorola One 5G Ace's body is a bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is noticeably thicker and was released many years before. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger display and a little bit better pixels count in each display inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures better photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a better resolution back camera and a much higher video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One 5G Ace is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.