Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Oxford blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's overall score of 82.5. Motorola One 5G's design is a lot newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. Motorola One 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola One 5G features a much better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.