Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting an 84.6 score against 83.7. Even though Motorola One 5G is newer than the LG V50 ThinQ, it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G features longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Motorola One 5G features a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a way more MP camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.