Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Motorola One 5G's body is noticeably newer and way thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is heavier. Motorola Droid Turbo has a better display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola One 5G features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processor than Motorola One 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and less CPU cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Motorola One 5G features improved battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has higher 30 fps video frame rate, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.