Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's score of 77.9. Even though Motorola One 5G is heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit superior processor than Motorola One 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola One 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
Motorola One 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh. The Motorola One 5G has a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture, higher 30 fps video frame rates and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.